Topic
Agentic AI: what holds up outside a demo
An agent that works in a demo and an agent that survives production are different systems. The gap is almost never the model. It is the loop around it: what the agent is allowed to call, what happens when a tool returns something unexpected, and who is accountable when it acts. These are the teardowns, essays and tools covering that ground.
92 pieces
Teardowns
15- Harness Engineering: The AI Agent Guardrails Nobody Demos The model is a component you swap. The harness around it, tool schemas, validation, sandboxes, budgets, permissions and audit logs, is where nearly every production AI incident actually starts.
- When AI Agents for Non-Technical Teams Reach the Shared Drive Agentic tools have moved out of the private chat window and into the folders a team depends on. What that relocation actually changes, checked against vendor documentation as of August 2026.
- Tool calling reliability: DeepSeek, Qwen, Kimi open weights and what to check before you build Four separate properties hide inside the phrase "tool calling works". Here is what each of the three Chinese open-weight families actually documents, where the calls break and how to test it yourself.
- pass^k vs pass@k agent reliability: your user only gets one run pass@k counts whether a success exists in k tries. pass^k counts whether every try worked. At a 0.61 success rate those read 0.99 and 0.09. Your user gets one run, so publish the second number.
- How to Test LLM Applications Without Calling the Model The model is the only part of an LLM application that cannot be tested deterministically. Everything around it can be, and that surrounding code is where most production incidents actually start.
- Agent Step Budget and Stop Conditions: What Actually Holds in Production Unbounded agent loops are financial incidents waiting to be billed. How to set a step ceiling against a task class, detect stagnation and bound cost separately from steps.
- Signing Off on AI Agent Security Without Lying to Yourself A language model cannot tell your instructions from the text it retrieves, because both arrive as the same token stream. Every real control follows from accepting that rather than trying to fix it.
- Designing APIs for AI Agents When the Caller Cannot Read Your Docs An API read by a model has different requirements from one read by a developer. Names become prompt, errors become instructions and idempotency stops being optional once the retry loop is autonomous.
- The agent control loop is where production agents fail Prompt engineering was never the hard part. The loop is: what the agent sees, what it may touch, what stops it and what a step costs. Most agent failures are loop failures, not model failures.
- AI Legacy Code Modernization Is Not a Translation Problem Legacy modernization was never mainly a translation problem. The hard parts are comprehension and behaviour preservation, and a model's real value sits almost entirely in the first one.
- Context Engineering Is Deciding What Earns a Place in the Window Windows grew to a million tokens and the industry assumed retrieval was solved. Attention still degrades, cost still scales, and everything you paste competes for the model's attention.
- AI Agent vs Agentic AI: Four Rungs, and Where Your Vendor Actually Sits An agent is a program: a model called in a loop with tools. Agentic is a property of that loop, meaning how much of the goal, the plan and the action the model chooses. A dial, not a category.
- OT Security Breaks the IT Playbook, and AI Agents Make It Worse Availability outranks confidentiality, you cannot patch a machine mid-run, and Modbus has no password because in 1979 the wall was the password. Then we connected all of it to AI.
- Claude Code in Production: Where It Earns Its Place and Where It Does Not Where an agentic coding tool earns its place in real engineering work, where it does not and why the reviewer is now the constraint. Claude Code as the worked example, with the tradeoffs named.
- Context Engineering vs Prompt Engineering: One Task, Two Fixes, Two Bills Prompt engineering optimises the wording. Context engineering decides what is in the window at all. As windows grew the bottleneck moved from phrasing to selection, and the bill moved with it.
Essays
4- The Four Levels of AI Fluency and Why Level Three Never Arrives on Its Own Most organisations are staffed entirely at level one and are surprised when level three does not happen by itself. The four levels of AI fluency are separated by what you own when it breaks.
- Agentic AI in Production: 95 Percent on SWE-bench, 21 Percent on Real Work Frontier models resolve about 95 percent of SWE-bench Verified and 20.6 percent of OSWorld 2.0. The gap is not noise. Step count, not task difficulty, is what still breaks agents in production.
- How 3 billion yuan of bubble tea manufactured AI adoption in China China's mass AI adoption was manufactured by firms owning payments, delivery and a super-app, not by consumer curiosity. Subsidy bought usage. Whether it bought habit is a separate question.
- Tencent QClaw Put OpenClaw on a Million Machines in Ten Days Tencent QClaw's real move is distribution, not intelligence: an MIT-licensed runtime Tencent did not write, wrapped into a three-minute consumer install that executes on the user's own machine.
Projects
3- Presenting technical work in a second language changes the preparation Second place at Tencent's OpenClaw hackathon in Shenzhen, pitched and defended in Mandarin. What changes about preparation, and what reading Chinese sources first-hand actually buys.
- Mentoring at the Global Youth AI Hackathon Mentored young builders at the Tencent-organised Global Youth AI Hackathon in Shenzhen, working on scoping, harness design and the difference between a demo and a system.
- Your sourcing agent is paid to make the order bigger Sourcing agents are paid a percentage of what you spend, so every good procurement decision costs them money. What engineer-led, fee-based buyer representation actually involves instead.
Tools
12 of 70- ChatGPT review OpenAI's assistant and API, now on the GPT-5.6 Sol, Terra and Luna tiers, with a 1M token context window on all three and reasoning effort you set per request.
- Cursor review A VS Code fork built around agentic editing, with its own Composer models, a pull request review bot and SOC 2 controls for teams that want AI in the editor.
- Databricks Mosaic AI review The AI layer inside Databricks: Agent Bricks, model serving, vector search and MLflow, all resolving back to Unity Catalog governed data.
- Dify review Open-source LLM app platform from LangGenius for agentic workflows and RAG pipelines. Modified Apache 2.0: self-host freely, multi-tenant SaaS needs a commercial licence.
- E2B review Firecracker microVM sandboxes for running AI-generated code. Python and JS SDKs, 24-hour sessions, pause and resume with full memory state, Apache 2.0 core you can self-host.
- ElevenLabs review Text to speech, voice cloning and transcription API covering 74 languages, aimed at teams shipping narration, dubbing and voice agents.
- Google Gemma 4 review Google's open-weight family in five sizes, 2B effective up to 31B dense, text and image in with audio on the smaller ones, 256K context and Apache 2.0 weights since April 2026.
- Langfuse review Open-source LLM tracing, prompt management and evals. MIT core with no seat or usage caps when self-hosted, cloud from $29 a month. Acquired by ClickHouse in January 2026.
- Lark CLI review MIT-licensed official CLI for Lark and Feishu (飞书), from ByteDance. 200+ commands and 24 agent skills over Docs, Base, Sheets, Calendar and approvals, built for AI agents.
- Milvus review Apache 2.0 vector database from Zilliz, self-hostable from a pip install up to a billion-vector cluster. The open engine under Zilliz Cloud, minus the proprietary Cardinal search core.
- MiniMax M3 review MiniMax's open-weight flagship LLM (稀宇科技), distinct from the Hailuo video product: 428B mixture-of-experts, 23B active per token, 1M context and native image and video input.
- OpenManus review MIT-licensed open agent framework from the MetaGPT team, prototyped in three hours as the open answer to Manus. 58,100 stars and still pushing commits in August 2026.